Yashasvi Jaiswal’s Dismissal Sparks DRS Debate in Fourth BGT Test at MCG

By /

Yashasvi Jaiswal’s Dismissal Sparks Debate Over DRS in Fourth BGT Test

Yashasvi Jaiswal’s controversial dismissal in the fourth Border-Gavaskar Trophy Test at the Melbourne Cricket Ground (MCG) has reignited debates about the reliability of the Decision Review System (DRS). The decision to overturn the on-field umpire’s call despite inconclusive evidence from the Snickometer has divided fans, experts, and former players.

The Controversial Decision

In the 71st over of India’s innings, Australian skipper Pat Cummins bowled a short ball to Jaiswal, who was on 84. He was batting confidently. Attempting a pull shot, Jaiswal was accused of edging the ball to wicketkeeper Alex Carey. The on-field umpire ruled him not out, but Cummins immediately signaled for a review.

The third umpire found no spike on the Snickometer. It usually detects contact between bat and ball. However, slow-motion replays suggested a possible deflection near Jaiswal’s gloves. The third umpire, based on the visuals, overturned the on-field decision. He declared Jaiswal out.

This call caused an uproar. Many felt that the Snickometer’s data should have taken precedence over visual evidence. Fans and analysts took to social media to debate the decision. This left the cricketing community divided.

Reactions to the Decision :

BCCI’s Stand

Rajeev Shukla, BCCI Vice-President, strongly criticized the decision. He said, “Yashaswi jayaswal was clearly not out. Third umpire should have taken note of what technology was suggesting. While over ruling field umpire third umpire should have solid reasons.” Shukla called for a review of the decision-making process in such cases. He stressed the need for consistency.

Former Players’ Opinions

Legendary Indian batsman Sunil Gavaskar questioned the decision. He argued, “If technology can’t prove an edge, the batter should get the benefit of the doubt.”

On the other hand, Aussie great Ricky Ponting backed the third umpire’s call. He said the visible deflection was enough to overturn the decision. “The deviation was clear, and the umpire had everything he needed to make the right call,”Ponting said.

India Captain Rohit Sharma’s View

Indian skipper Rohit Sharma took a practical view on the issue at the post-match press conference. “It wasn’t visible on Snicko, but there was a clear deviation to the naked eye. It seemed like he did make contact. It’s a tough call, but we respect the umpire’s decision,” Rohit remarked.

Neutral Expert Analysis

Former ICC Elite Panel umpire Simon Taufel defended the third umpire. He said the decision followed the rules. Taufel explained, “While technology is an excellent aid, it is not infallible. In this case, the visual evidence of the ball deflecting off the glove was sufficient to make the call.”

Impact on the Match

Jaiswal’s dismissal turned out to be a critical moment in the game. At 142/4, India seemed on course to post a competitive total. However, his wicket triggered a collapse. The team added just 13 runs to finish at 155 in their second innings.

Australia took its chance and chased down the target. They won by 184 runs. The win leveled the Border-Gavaskar Trophy series at 2-2, setting up a thrilling finale.

What This Means for DRS

Jaiswal’s out has renewed debates on DRS’s reliability in big matches. Technology has improved decision-making. But, this incident shows its limits. It also shows the challenge of balancing human judgment with tech tools.

The controversy has raised calls for more transparency in decision-making. This is especially true when different technologies conflict.

Scroll to Top